NYTimes: With Coal Plans Cut Back, Texas Faces Energy Gap

With regard to today’s New York Times article on Texas’ looming energy deficit in the wake of the TXU buyout and scuttling of at least eight of the proposed eleven coal-fired power plants (see http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/business/08energy.html) …

Nary a mention is made of the opportunity for Texas legislators to bridge this “energy gap” by encouraging (or, dare I propose, imposition of) more creative and greener changes in consumer behavior. On the heels of recent local discussions of the Trans Texas Corridor, why aren’t our fearless leaders proposing that we use some of the same financial tools enacted to encourage automobile travel and air pollution (e.g. bond funds) to promote the creation and expansion of renewable energy sources and transmission infrastructure. I never cease to be amazed at how one-dimensional our thinking is regarding energy futures!

Let’s abandon our entrenched business-as-usual mindset and strike out on a new, sustainable future that we can imagine surviving the next two hundred years.

Report on AICP Certification Maintenance

As previously reported, the AICP Commission is considering requiring certification maintenance through continuing education starting in January 2008. The Commission received more than 1,400 comments in response to the first draft proposal for a certification maintenance program released in early December. Overall, members expressed strong support for some form of certification maintenance.
The revised program now posted responds to many of the concerns that were raised during the first comment period.

Please review the certification maintenance program and submit your comments to AICP-CM AT planning DOT org no later than Wednesday, March 21. You may also participate in a virtual town hall meeting by logging onto http://ecommunities.planning.org using your APA ID.

The Commission is expected to vote on instituting certification maintenance at its next meeting in April.

(Taken from APA Plannernet posting, 2 March 2007.)

UTA Campus Master Plan: John Hall, VP Administration and Campus Operations; 5.30pm Monday, 5 March

Mark your calendars for 5.30-7.00pm, Monday, 5 March, University Hall 532! SPA presents John Hall, Vice President for Administration and Campus Operations, for a presentation of the status of the UT Arlington Campus Master Plan. Mr. Hall is custodian of the master plan and has been working closely with President Spaniolo to enhance our physical facilities and environment, and with the City of Arlington to integrate the University with the surrounding community.

This is an open meeting, so please feel free to invite your friends or anyone else you know who might be interested. We’ll provide a little something on which to nosh beginning at 5.30pm; Mr. Hall will begin his presentation at 6pm.

UTA drawing up long-term master plan

From the Star-Telegram, 28 February 2007: http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/local/16799771.htm

4S Abstract - Climate change and planning

An abstract I have submitted for the annual meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science (Montreal, Oct. 11-13, http://www.4sonline.org/meeting.htm). The session is entitled “Towards a Socio-Technical Understanding of Architecture & Urbanism. 2) Reclaiming the city: An STS perspective on urban knowledge and activism.”

The paper stems from my inquiry into the intersection of urban planning theory and the field known as Science, Technology, and Society (aka Science and Technology Studies, STS). Drawing on the disciplines of political science, sociology, anthropology, philosophy, history, and others, STS considers how science and technology shape and are shaped by society.

Jeff Howard

 

Implications of rapid climate change for urban planning – A reconstructivist STS perspective

 

This paper focuses on a conundrum of urban planning theory and practice that in the early years of the millennium grows more conspicuous by the day: how to overcome the inertia of prevailing disciplinary concepts, institutions, and political-economic postures predicated on endless spatial, material, and economic growth in order to decisively confront the implications of rapid global climate change. Drawing on the theories of democratic expertise and intelligent trial and error, the paper offers a preliminary survey of the intersection of planning and the reconstructivist mode of STS.

ACSP abstract — Ecological planning

An abstract I have submitted for the annual meeting of theAmerican Collegiate Schools of Planning (Oct. 18-21, Milwaukee, http://www.acsp.org/events/conferences.html). The session is entitled “Ecological Planning – New Theoretical Approaches for Planning Paper.”

Jeff Howard

Intelligent trial and error as a theoretical framework for ecological planning

Intelligent trial and error (ITE), an extension of political theorist Charles Lindblom’s work on incrementalist decision making, has been developed in the field of science and technology studies as a framework for coping with the inevitable and frequently profound uncertainty inherent in technological development – and for minimizing the frequency and seriousness of mistakes that plague such development. The paper begins by outlining the premise of ITE and briefly reviewing its application in technology studies. The paper then explores ITE’s applicability as a framework for understanding and addressing the analytical and political challenges of ecological planning. If we understand planning as a pivotal species of technological decision making, how might ITE help us (re)interpret the ecologically haphazard character of conventional planning and the significance of the marginalization of ecological planning? How might it help us strategically confront the challenge of making ecological planning sufficiently intelligent to help move humanity beyond the global environmental crisis to which conventional planning has made such an enormous contribution? Answers to these questions, the paper argues, revolve around how these forms of planning approach six strategic considerations – precaution, the pace of feedback, monitoring the pace of scale-up, commitment to flexibility, and incentives for error correction – and, consequently, how planning expertise is conceptualized and politically enacted.

Collingridge, David. 1992. The Management of Scale: Big Organizations, Big Decisions, Big Mistakes. London: Routledge.

Lindblom, Charles E. 1959. “The science of ‘muddling through’,” Public Administration Review 19: 79-88.

Lindblom, Charles E. 1965. The Intelligence of Democracy: Decision Making through Mutual Adjustment. New York: Free Press.

Lindblom, Charles. 1990. Inquiry and Change: The Troubled Attempt to Understand and Shape Society. New Haven: Yale.

Morone, Joseph G., and Edward J. Woodhouse. 1986. Averting Catastrophe: Strategies for Regulating Risky Technologies. Berkeley, CA: University of California.

Woodhouse, E. J. 1988. “Sophisticated trial and error in decision making about risk.” In Technology and Politics, ed. Michael Kraft, Norman Vig. Durham, NC: Duke University, 208-223.

Woodhouse, Edward J. 1983b. “Toxic chemicals and technological society: Decision-making strategies when errors can be catastrophic.” Diss., Political Science, Yale University, Princeton, NJ.

ACSP abstract — Planning for climate protection

 

An abstract I have submitted for the annual meeting of theAmerican Collegiate Schools of Planning (Oct. 18-21, Milwaukee, http://www.acsp.org/events/conferences.html).  The session is entitled “Planners’ Role in Reducing GHG Emissions.”

Jeff Howard

 

 

Planning for strong climate protection: Toward a democratic, precautionary footing for planning expertise

The broad consensus that a global climate disaster is underway must be understood as a profound challenge to planning theory and practice: how to move climate protection from the periphery of the profession and the discipline directly into their core. The crisis presents a singular opportunity to examine – and reshape – the political assumptions embedded in mainstream planning expertise. The climate crisis exposes some of the central, largely tacit political assumptions of mainstream planning experts, who have informed, sanctioned, and actively facilitated sprawling, car-dependent, energy-intensive urban and suburban development. Drawing on political-theoretical critiques of scientific and technical expertise, the paper proposes that these assumptions are intimately bound up with a model of the planning expert as technocrat. The paper then argues that if the planning community is to commit itself to greenhouse gas reduction as deep and rapid as the crisis appears to demand, it will require a dramatically different model of expertise: one predicated on marrying experts and laypeople in a more explicitly political and thoroughly democratic fashion than conventional understandings of planning expertise would allow; and one predicated on protection of environment and public health in the face of scientific uncertainty.

Fischer, Frank. 1990. Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Fischer, Frank. 1993. “Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases.” Policy Sciences 26: 165-87.

Forester, John. 1999. The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge: MIT.

Myers, Nancy J., and Carolyn Raffensperger, eds. 2006. Precautionary Tools for Reshaping Environmental Policy. Urban and Industrial Environments. Cambridge: MIT.

White, Rodney R. 2002. Building the Ecological City. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.

Woodhouse, Edward J., and Dean Nieusma. 2001. Democratic expertise: Integrating knowledge, power, and participation. Knowledge, Power, and Participation in Environmental Policy Analysis. M. Hisschemöller, R. Hoppe, W. N. Dunn and J. R. Ravetz. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction: 73-96.

City of Arlington Internship Opportunity

The City of Arlington Public Works Department is recruiting for a summer intern, preferably a graduate student pursuing an MPA. Hourly pay will be $12/hour. Please see attached brochure and circulate as appropriate. Feel free to contact me with any questions.

Cindy Hanna
Operations Analyst II
Public Works & Transportation Department
817.459.6545 direct
hannac AT ci DOT arlington DOT tx DOT us
City of Arlington Intern Brochure

Pedro, the recycling otter …

A post on Grist - http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2007/2/22/133326/131

University of Louisville: Doctoral Assistantships

The Urban and Public Affairs Ph.D. program at the University of Louisville has several assistantships available for the 2007-08 academic year. Assistantship support is available for up to four years, and includes a stipend of $18,000 paid over 12 months, plus tuition remission, health insurance, and office space with a computer. In addition, financial support is provided for travel to conferences and, in some cases, for dissertation research.

The Ph.D. program has tracks in (1) Urban Planning and Development and (2) Urban Policy and Administration. We are particularly interested in attracting students desiring to work in areas such as Environmental Policy, Urban Design, Urban Demography, and housing, although potential students with interests in other relevant areas are also encouraged to apply.

For further information, see our web site at http://supa.louisville.edu or write to upa@louisville.edu.

« Previous PageNext Page »